One law for all asserts that the English Draft of the Treaty of Waitangi is determinative, despite never being signed by Māori.
One law for all seeks to divide Māori into loyal Māori and agitators (Achievers and Grievers), while at the same time complaining about our divided society.
One law for all frames their debate in the Western tradition, ignoring the fact that Te Tiriti o Waitangi is a Māori text.
One law for all ignores settled principles of International law in relation to the interpretation of Treaties between sovereign nations.
One law for all asserts that Māori granted sovereignty to Queen Victoria in Te Tiriti o Waitangi despite the inability to understand the difference between sovereignty, kawanatanga and tino rangatiratanga.
One law for all believes that the property rights of every citizen should be respected, unless those property rights are held by Māori.
One law for all believers complain about Māori privilege yet are often unable to identify instances of such privilege.
One law for all believes that it is okay to sentence Māori to longer prison terms than non-Māori for similar crimes.
One law for all complains about Government money being wasted on Māori settlements and programmes, yet wants to waste Government money on a poorly worded referendum.
One law for all complains about the Treaty “Gravy-Train”, despite the $2bn paid out over the past 17 years representing approximately 0.5% of Government expenditure over this period, and amounting to less than the total amount of tax paid by Māori in the same period.*
None of this is one law for all. It is colonisation and subjugation writ large. Advocates do not want one law for all, they want their law for all. There is a massive difference between the two. Unfortunately, proponents of one law for all are too intellectually challenged to see it.
*These figures are based on the following assumptions: Annual Government Expenditure of $30 billion per year, and 100,000 Māori paying approximately $1200 in tax on average each year. Overall, the $2bn paid out in Settlements represents a total of $500 per person in New Zealand (or $30 per person per year). Mr Ansell, I am prepared to write you a $500 cheque for your share of the cost of settling 170 years of historical grievance between an Indigenous People and their Colonial aggressors if you will agree to never again write about a subject which you clearly do not understand and willingly misrepresent.